🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly enabling the radical right to dictate the public discourse, according to a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics found that this trend has unwittingly benefited far-right parties by validating their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Study Based on Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from six German publications.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the far right shifted from fringe issues in the late 1990s to core themes like integration and migration, established political groups increasingly adapted their communication in response.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these concepts and signaled to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by established political groups is crucial in the voting performance of the far right," stated a political sociologist participating in the study.

"This element has been underestimated," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional parties were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is key."

Mainstreaming Effect Across the Continent

While the research was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to affect countries throughout Europe.

"You see this a lot in European media," explained another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Hardening of Political Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also toughened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a former national leader advocated widespread expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be observed across Europe, as elected officials from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, particularly on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that was inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the strict platform of the radical right, even as research suggests that this approach leads the electorate to vote for the far right.

Progressive Influence and Public Perception

The extent of information collected revealed that the influence of far-right parties had been gradual and had grown with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," commented a researcher. "But if you encounter this negative framing around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Discourses

The research highlighted the need for established parties to carve out their distinct narratives, especially on topics such as immigration and assimilation, instead of constantly following the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one author. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."